LGBTQ+ Student Rights
CDC data has shown that LGBTQ students are at higher risk of experiencing bullying, harassment, violence, and suicide.
Schools are generally required to address reports of harassment and bullying for all students under federal and state laws. In some states, this may include cases involving sexual orientation and gender identity. This failure to supervise students may provide grounds for disciplinary action against teachers and other school staff responsible for their care.
The student expert witness team at School Liability Expert Group remains up-to-date on legal developments and nuanced regulations regarding expressions of one’s sexual orientation in educational settings.
How Recent Title IX Changes Affect LGBTQ+ Protections
Note: On January 9, 2025, a federal judge in Kentucky struck down the Biden administration’s expanded Title IX rules that included protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The court ruled that the administration had exceeded its authority by broadening the definition of “sex” discrimination to encompass gender identity and sexual orientation, stating that such an expansion contradicted the original intent of Title IX.
Following this ruling, on January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.”
This order defines “sex” strictly based on biological attributes determined at birth and rescinds previous executive orders that recognized gender identity under federal protections. Consequently, the Department of Education has reverted to the 2020 Title IX regulations established during Trump’s first term, which do not extend protections to LGBTQ+ students.
The student expert witness team from School Liability Expert Group can review cases and address issues involving LGBTQ rights and related harassment that occurred between 2020 and 2025, when schools were required to address these matters.
Some States Might Still Offer Protections
Some states still might have protections for LGBTQ students under their state laws, separate from federal law. This type of non-discrimination may apply to school rules and procedures, student supervision, and disciplinary efforts.
Consider a school with a clear rule prohibiting public displays of affection, such as kissing, in the hallways for all students. This rule does not infringe on student rights, as it applies to all students.
However, it is similar to the dress code example earlier; if this rule is never enforced for straight couples but is consistently implemented, with consequences for LGBTQ couples, a student discipline expert witness may view this as discriminatory treatment, depending on state law or school policy.